During a stall recovery, which statement best illustrates an 'anti-authority' reaction by the instructor?

In the context of pilot training, an 'anti-authority' reaction refers to a situation where an individual rejects or questions the authority or advice of an instructor or expert. This often stems from a belief that the rules or guidance do not apply to them personally.

The statement, "The aircraft can handle a lot more than the maneuvering speed," reflects an anti-authority reaction because it implies a disregard for the established safety parameters regarding stall recovery. This response suggests that the learner may feel overconfident about the aircraft's capabilities and is dismissing the guidance that may come from regulatory standards or the instructor's experience. This can lead to dangerous decision-making in the cockpit, where understanding and respecting the limitations of the aircraft are crucial for safe operations.

The other statements do not demonstrate an anti-authority mindset. For instance, referencing past experiences or expressing confidence in the learner's skills aligns more with supportive teaching or reinforcing the learner's capability rather than displaying a challenge to authority or established safety norms. Each of these alternatives either reinforces the authority of the instructor or indicates an expectation that the learner should already have acquired certain knowledge, rather than questioning or dismissing essential training guidelines.